Category Archives: Local Health Integration Networks

Want to solve the ALC problem? Stop designating patients as ALC.

In Dr. David Walker’s summer ALC (alternate level of care) report he gives the example of the Toronto Central LHIN’s efforts to reduce their ALC roster.

Alternate level of care patients are said to be indivdiuals who have completed their acute care but are unable to go home or secure a long term care bed. There used to be an ugly word for them — bed blockers — which appeared to put the blame on the patient for a failure of the system to provide a continuum of care.

The Toronto Central LHIN identified 148 long-stay ALC patients for review. While the LHIN was able to transition 28 of these ALC patients to alternate destinations, 22 were deemed medically unstable and not ALC at all. That’s nearly 15 per cent.

Continue reading

Is McGuinty quietly adopting the Walker report?

August 31st the Ontario Ministry of Health did a curious thing. They posted on their website a report by Dr. David Walker, who had been appointed ALC lead back in January. There was no press release, no press conference, no op/eds were written supporting Walker’s 32 recommendations. Walker had submitted his report at the end of June, and for two months the government mulled it over before deciding to make it public on the eve of an election. During that election there was virtually no talk of Walker’s report.

ALC is the term for alternate level of care patients — those who have completed their acute care treatment in hospital but are not stable enough to return home.

Normally this kind of treatment of a report indicates a “thanks, but no thanks” attitude by government. However, at a meeting with public service reform commissioner Don Drummond, the Ontario Health Coalition was told that the government has actually accepted the recommendations of Walker.

Continue reading

Foundation calls for more powerful LHINs – but how accountable will they be?

Board members of the Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) serve at the pleasure of the government of the day. They are appointed by Order in Council, and have a reporting relationship directly to the Minister of Health.

There isn’t much direct criticism from the LHINs of government health care policies, including organization of the LHINs.

Last week the Change Foundation issued a new report on integrated health care — Winning Conditions to improve patient experiences: integrated health care in Ontario. What’s significant is the Change Foundation report was reviewed by key players within the system, including Bill MacLeod, CEO of the Mississauga Halton LHIN.

While the Change Foundation suggests the final report wasn’t necessarily endorsed by the reviewers, this is an organization that has some high level participation from key stakeholders, including former deputy minister Ron Sapsford, who sits on the Foundation board alongside departing Ontario Hospital Association CEO Tom Closson.

The Change Foundation suggests that the LHINs function differently in reality than on paper, calling their “authority” a debatable point, the conditions on which they’ve had to operate “have been hardly winning.”

Continue reading

Public or private, there is only one health care funder — us

On Wednesday former Saskatchewan Premier Roy Romanow expressed some regret over the cuts he made to health care while his province faced a tough economy. Speaking at a Canadian Health Coalition forum in Ottawa, Romanow admitted that pushing health care costs on to individuals was a false economy. The cuts have also created a lasting legacy for his political party, which has struggled to maintain seats in rural Saskatchewan after closure of many small town hospitals. This may be a direct lesson for Dalton McGuinty, whose government has itself toyed with the idea of reducing the scope of services at rural hospitals and delisted some OHIP coverage, particularly around physiotherapy, eye examinations, and chiropractic care.

Whether we pay through our tax dollars, or pay out-of-pocket, as Canadians we still pay. Evidence would suggest the difference between the two is a single-payer (tax-funded) health system is far more efficient and equitable.

Continue reading

A time of great anxiety for the LHINs

These are likely times of great anxiety for the Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs).

The re-election of the McGuinty Liberals may have created a brief sigh of relief given both opposition parties had promised to kill the LHINs. According to the Mowat Centre’s Will Falk, there is “very broad consensus” that the LHINs will still be restructured.

Continue reading

Drummond recommends “structural redesign” of health care, but is he qualified to deliver?

“We have probably spent 40 per cent of our time on health care.” – Don Drummond, Toronto Star, November 10, 2011

There is no question that health care will figure predominantly in the Drummond Commission’s report expected in January.

The Commission was struck last march to look at “reforming” Ontario’s public services. The Commission has chosen who to meet with — it has not been an open process. There have been no public hearings.

Continue reading

Health Systems: Why can’t we be less like the US and more like Denmark?

Compared to the United States, Canada’s health care system appears to be the model of efficiency. The United States continues to be an outlier when it comes to health care. Americans spend a greater percentage of their overall economy on health care than in any other United Nations member state – except for East Timor. And yet many of their key outcome indicators are well below countries that spend far less.

According to international OECD data (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), in 2008 Canada spent $4,079 (US) per capita on both private and public health care. The US spent $7,538 (US).

What we often forget in these comparisons is about a third of our health care system is very much like the United States. Most of us do not pull out our OHIP card when we visit the dentist or the pharmacy. When Dalton McGuinty was first elected in 2004, he established a dedicated health care tax that brings in about $3 billion per year. He also delisted physiotherapy, eye exams and chiropractic care. Most now have to pay for these services through private insurance or out-of-pocket. Now we are seeing more Ontarians, tired of waiting for home care services, paying out-of-pocket to get service from the same agencies that are responsible for providing public care. According to the Ontario Home Care Association, 20 million hours – or about 40 per cent of home care – is purchased privately.

Continue reading

Musyj calls for hospital mergers despite lack of supporting evidence

Windsor Regional Hospital CEO David Musyj is suggesting the best way to bend the health care cost curve is to amalgamate his hospital with Windsor Hotel Dieu Hospital.

As usual, Musyj lacks any evidence to support his suggestion, made before an audience of Rotarians in that city.

He may instead want to look at the independent Canadian Health Services Research Foundation web site, which says there is no evidence that such mergers save money.

“While the intuitive appeal of ‘bigger is better’ in hospital mergers is powerful, it’s clear the empirical evidence is weak and the potential for negative outcomes significant,” the Research Foundation states.

The Foundation warns that mergers are particularly difficult on staff morale, which has a direct impact on the quality of patient care.

They also note that mergers can disrupt services and absorb more management attention during a transition period, also affecting patient care.

The Windsor Star notes that the merger may be a tough sell given the last such merger cost the region two hospital sites and beds.

When mergers do occur, senior management usually go cap in hand to their boards, asking for more compensation to deal with the greater responsibility they now face.

Other money saving ideas Musyj gave the Rotarians include cuts to outpatient services and charging patients a fee for emergency room visits – the latter a clear violation of the Canada Health Act.

Musyj said Ontario needed a Royal Commission to look at the way the province delivers health services.

He also defended the LHINs, suggesting moving administrative offices to London or Toronto would not be in the best interests of his community.

LHINs – Funding in a time of scarcity

This spring’s provincial budget set aside a three per cent base funding increase for community-based health care agencies this year. That doesn’t mean Community Care Access Centres, Canadian Mental Health Association branches or other local agencies will necessarily receive that amount.

The dilemma for the Local Health Integration Networks is whether to pass on an across–the-board increase that amounts to less than this spring’s Consumer Price Index, or whether to split that modest increase to address specific problems within the regional health care system? Do you make the situation worse for some agencies by slashing their funding increase to improve the situation for high-priority agencies faced with significant challenges? Either way, you know somebody is going to be unhappy. Worst still, does the absence of adequate funding for some agencies show up in new unforeseen challenges for next year?

The Central East LHIN passed a motion today that effectively cleaved the across-the-board funding increase in half – to 1.5 per cent – while using the remaining funds to address some serious problems within the LHIN. For those receiving only the 1.5 per cent, they will be in good company with the hospitals, most of whom will receive a similar base increase for a second year in a row.

 What is important to stress is that these are base increases, not total increases.

As we have seen with the hospitals, while the base was 1.5 per cent, many hospitals increased their bottom line by more than 4 per cent last year thanks to a variety of budget envelopes and increases in own-source revenues. For some agencies, particularly the very small ones, 1.5 per cent could turn out to be the total they do receive. James Meloche, a Senior Director with the CE LHIN, said 1.5 per cent could amount to as little as $900 for some agencies.

The 1.5 per cent the LHIN is reallocating is not a huge amount – about $5 million to support a population of 1.4 million, or about 11 per cent of Ontario’s population.  That’s about $3.50 per resident. This is on a provincial health budget of $47 billion.

While Don Drummond hammers away at unsustainable costs, there are no huge funding increases here at the health care coalface.

Clearly the region has a capacity problem, particularly when it comes to placing seniors into care following a hospital stay.

The LHIN has decided that it will address the problem by targeting the problem further upstream. By providing improved supports in the home, the LHIN hopes to avoid the arrival of seniors in the region’s already crowded emergency departments. Keeping people healthy is far more likely to be a winning strategy.

That does not necessarily mean more money for the CCAC – in fact, even with an allocation of almost half the available money, the CCAC will receive slightly less than the three per cent.

The LHIN is betting that more assisted living – including home making and falls prevention, among other services – will help keep seniors healthier in their homes and avoid hospital admissions.

The Oshawa/Whitby area will also be targeted, particularly for increased support for mental health and addictions. With a struggling economy, the communities have been hard hit by the recession, a situation that is putting pressure on health care providers.

“Clearly we have an issue at Lakeridge Health,” said Meloche. “People live in the park and they come to the emergency department for care.”

Fortunately one of the few mental health agencies in Ontario that will receive patients with concurrent addictions problems is already in the Oshawa community.  While several years ago Pinewood/Destiny Manor faced closure from a Ministry that wanted the hospital to cut unfunded mental health services, the service is now considered a major asset for the LHIN.

The LHIN is also trying to take some of the pressure off the Northeast part of its region by providing about $259,000 to establish a rural-based palliative care team.

While these are the priorities of the Central East LHIN, it does not necessarily mean that other LHINs will treat the funding in this manner.

* * *

The Central East LHIN used their “Urgent Priority Funding” to increase the volume of MRIs available in the region.  Senior Director Paul Barker pointed out that while the government was generously funding new MRI machines in the region, the actual funding for scans had gone down. The LHIN is tapping into this fund to provide $285,327 to buy 1,096 more MRI hours. Most hospitals can conduct about 1.5 scans per hour. The average wait for an MRI scan in the LHIN was 77 days as of July. One board member asked how it was Ontario hospitals could perform MRI scans for $260 an hour when they were charging $1600 for the same service in the United States. Barker pointed out that it may have something to do with the free market and profit-taking.

 As part of its planned to establish an umbrella organization to coordinate specialized geriatric services, the LHIN named the Northumberland Hills Hospital the “host agency.” A small secretariat will be set up at the hospital to work on a strategy to better deliver services to frail seniors. The immediate task will be to hire a project manager, recruit staff, establish office space and work on governance issues. The LHIN had found service providers, seniors and their families were largely unaware of what services were available in the LHIN. 2,100 seniors account for a third of all acute spending on seniors in the LHIN.  By focusing on the needs of this population, it could have a substantial impact on the overall use of acute care services in the LHIN.

Health Care Platforms: Ontario Greens to review LHINs

The Greens have the most aggressive fiscal position among the four Ontario political parties, insisting they can balance the budget by 2015 — two years earlier than that promised by the Tories and Liberals.

However, the party is also promising income tax cuts and cuts to small business taxes. They also want to freeze tuition fees at post-secondary institutions.

How they intend to carry off this feat of cutting revenues and balancing the budget early while making significant spending commitments is unclear.

The Greens say they will continue to increase health care spending, but then reiterate the nonsense claim that health care is on track to consume 80 per cent ofOntario’s budget if something isn’t done soon. What would that something look like?

The Greens, like every other party, say they will “make more efficient use of health care dollars.” While they point to new initiatives they’d like to fund – including more home care, transitional care, long term care and more family/community health clinics – there is little to indicate where the efficiencies would come from aside from the usual cuts to administration.

By omission it’s also easy to see where they wouldn’t spend health care dollars: hospitals. This is despite criticism of emergency wait times.

It is not clear what administration the Greens would like to do away with. Recent drivers towards more health care administration center around government initiatives to collect data on dozens of health indicators that purportedly assist with evidence-based decision-making. Patient and staff satisfaction surveys are also costly from an administrative point of view, but part of an increased trend towards more patient-centered care. And if the Greens want the LHINs to do a better job of consulting the public, they may need to pay for that.

The Greens are promising to deliver electronic health records by using best practices from other places. Given there are already more than six million Ontarians who presently have electronic health records, and that the current timetable is to bring all Ontarians on-line by 2015, it’s not clear whether the Greens would actually stop the present work to look for something it could buy off the shelf. While the Greens want electronic health records, they say e-Health is one place they could save money.

While the Tories want to do away entirely with the LHINs – and replace them with nothing – the Greens say they will “put communities back in charge of local health care decisions.” They say they will instead review the LHINs and see if they need to be fixed or replaced. Oddly, they say they would put strict limits on administrative and consulting budgets for the LHINs despite the fact that LHINs are essentially administrative and consulting bodies.

The Greens are committed to investing $1.6 billion over four years in Community Care Centres, Aboriginal Health Access Centres, Family Health Teams and practices that team doctors with nurses, dieticians, psychologists, counsellors, physiotherapists and others.

They would also spend $2 billion over four years to improve “affordable care for seniors.” That would include more home care, transitional care, assisted living, tax credits for family members staying at home with seniors, case managers to help seniors navigate the health care system, and more supports to long term care.

They say they will also establish a goal of providing 50 per cent of Ontarians with access to a family care team by 2016, rising to 90 per cent by 2020. The assumption is Ontarians would want to drop their local GP for team-based care. The question is, would they have a choice?

One local Green candidate may have been winging it when he told a community forum “other specialized workers, such as nurse practitioners, can help streamline care by taking on tasks now done by physicians, allowing those doctors to focus on medical care.” One has to wonder what kind of care a nurse practitioner would be delivering if it wasn’t medical care?

He may have been trying to articulate the party’s position regarding expanding the scope of practice for health professions, which would allow members of those professions to “practise to the full extent of their demonstrated competencies as verified by their respective regulatory bodies.”

For-profit nursing homes will love the Green Party promise to “reform the funding model for long-term care homes to increase flexibility and to encourage innovation and efficiencies.” At present the debate in the nursing homes is about limiting the transition of funding from the clinical envelope to the accommodations envelope. Operators are only allowed to take profit from the accommodations envelope, and therefore would like a more “flexible arrangement.” The Greens would make it much easier for the large for-profit nursing home chains to siphon money from direct clinical care into profit.”

Like the other parties, the Greens place considerable emphasis on preventative care, with a focus on the environment. They will spend $600 million over four years on various food programs and on tax credits for children and adult recreation programs.

—-

Posted anonymously:  You have forgotten to list the Socialist Party of Ontario http://www.socialistpartyofontario.ca