Category Archives: Long Term Care

Fun with funding – for profit “envelope” gets biggest share of increase

Provincial long-term care funding is delivered to Ontario’s nursing homes bundled in what the Ministry likes to call “envelopes.” These figures are allocated for each resident under care.

There is an envelope for nursing and personal care, another for program and support services, one for raw food costs, and a fourth for accommodations.

August 9 the Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant LHIN sent out a memo outlining the increase in funding for each of these envelopes.

The per diem for nursing and personal care will rise by 1 per cent – or 86 cents – to $86.91. The per diem for program and support services will rise by just 8 cents to $8.43. Despite rapidly rising food costs, homes will only get 22 cents more per day to provide three meals, snacks and drinks. Homes receive $7.68 daily for raw food costs. The biggest winner will be the accommodations envelope, which will rise by $1.09 to $52.17.

Guess which of the four envelopes for-profit homes are allowed to draw profit from? If you guessed accommodations, you would be correct.

Given all the problems with care and support in Ontario’s nursing homes, this appears to be a very odd priority.

Are “high hazard” nursing homes “efficient?”

In BC they have a ratings system for residential care homes, or what we would refer to as “long-term care” homes in Ontario. The ratings look at complaints and critical incidents and determine whether a home is low, medium or high hazard. The hazard rating determines how often the home will be inspected. A high hazard home in BC can count on a surprise inspection about every three months.

In Ontario Health Minister Deb Matthews would simply rather not know.

She has too few inspectors, and the complaint and critical incident inspections are taking way too long – a point the Ombudsman made in 2010. The more in-depth resident quality inspections are taking so long it will take more than five years to fully inspect all the homes, that is “if” they get inspected at all.

Continue reading

Ontario has fewer nursing home inspectors than U.S. States

Ontario fares poorly compared to other jurisdictions when it comes to inspecting its 641 nursing homes.

Last week we pointed out the impossibility of about 70 nursing home inspectors being able to investigate nearly 6,000 complaints and critical incidents as well as conduct 120 in-depth resident quality inspections. At that rate, it will take more than five years before every Ontario long-term care home receives a thorough inspection.

While using a made-in-the-USA inspection regime, it is not putting the same number of inspectors on the job as most US states.

Faced with public outrage over the treatment of seniors in their nursing homes, the State of Illinois recently passed a new law requiring one inspector for every 500 beds. If Ontario had the same law, the number of inspectors would more than double to 154.

Continue reading

Zero tolerance for abuse and neglect? Hardly.

Health Minister Deb Matthews talks about zero tolerance of neglect and abuse in Ontario’s nursing homes. Her actions would suggest the opposite.

Yesterday Matthews said that inspection of long-term care homes will be based on complaints and critical incidents only. If the home doesn’t get complaints or critical incidents go unreported, it doesn’t get inspected.

This is despite a requirement in the Long Term Care Homes Act that requires an annual inspection of each home.

Jane Meadus of the Advocacy Centre for the Elderly says the intent of the Act was that each home would receive an annual resident quality inspection (RQI) – a detailed inspection conducted by a team of specialists, including an RN, a dietitian and an environmental inspector. An RQI can take as long as 17 days to conduct.

Continue reading

Frail and elderly asked to pay more in Ontario

Frail and elderly residents in Ontario’s nursing homes may be paying in more ways than one for the province’s budget shortfall.

While Health Minister Deb Matthews is holding the line on increases to long-term care funding to 2.8 per cent (only 1 per cent dedicated to direct care), she is asking residents to kick in a lot more than that.

On May 30th the Ministry issued a bulletin to say the basic co-payment rate is increasing by $1.81 per day. That amounts to a 3.4 per cent increase.

The premium rate is also increasing from an additional $8 a day to $9 a day for semi-private (8.8 per cent) and from $18 to $19.75 a day for private (9.1 per cent).

Depending on the accommodation level, that could mean a hike of between $54 and $106 per month.

This comes at a time when Deb Matthews is also holding the line on the Ministry’s complement of inspectors, who say they are so short-staffed that homes will be waiting as long as five years for a detailed inspection.

While business is being told to wait for another cut in their taxes, frail and elderly residents are being asked to pay more for their care.

Vulnerable seniors: Nursing homes could wait five years for a full inspection

It could take more than five years before all of Ontario’s nursing homes receive a full inspection by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Further, the complaints hotline overwhelmed inspection teams with 2,719 complaints last year, leaving many families to wait anywhere from 30 days to a year to get their complaint investigated.

Inspectors say that it is taking so long to investigate that they are sometimes arriving to find the resident who issued the complaint has passed away.

The 2007 Long Term Care Homes Act was meant to address incidents of abuse and neglect in Ontario’s nursing homes, but the government is considering any visit to the home an “annual inspection,” even if it is only for a specific complaint. Prior to 2010, homes were subject to a full inspection of all programs and services.

Each office of the Long Term Care Unit presently has an informal goal of completing two “resident quality inspections” (RQI) per month. RQIs are the new version of what used to be considered an annual inspection. That means the province has a goal of conducting 120 RQIs per year. Ontario has 630 licensed nursing homes.

Continue reading

Fixing long term care not one of health minister’s choices either

It only took a day to dash hopes that Ontario was finally going to take significant measures to improve long-term care.

The Long Term Care Task Force on Resident Care and Safety made 18 recommendations Wednesday to improve care and reduce incidents of abuse in the province’s nursing homes.

The task force was created after Health Minister Deb Matthews called sector leaders into her office after the latest feature series in the Toronto Star detailed fresh cases of resident abuse.

After weeks of telling us that hospitals and doctors had to be cut in order to make choices, Matthews is now saying there is no money at this time for long-term care either.

Continue reading

Ontario likes Denmark’s model for aging, but will McGuinty really pay for it?

“In Denmark, they started planning for folks getting older in 1986 and they developed a wonderful system of caring in the community. We kind of started three years ago.”Dr. Peter Zalan, president of the medical staff at Health Sciences North (Sudbury), in response overcrowding and long waits in the ER. (CBC News)

In 1987 Denmark decided to build no new nursing homes, and since then, the number of beds has dropped dramatically.

However, that does not mean there are no residential facilities for seniors that provide around the clock care in the country of 5.5 million. In 2007 about 41,000 Danes received permanent help in either a nursing home or a “nursing dwelling.” By comparison, Ontario with a population of more than 13 million people has about 76,000 people in long-term care homes.

What Denmark does do is provide a lot more home care.

Continue reading

CCACs not given sufficient resources to deal with “home first” initiative

The government speaks regularly about moving services out of hospitals and into community-based care, including nursing homes and home care.

They tell us that it is not only more cost-effective, but it is preferred by patients.

So what is the deal with holding the line on CCACs and nursing home beds at a time when the hospitals are being placed under extreme pressure to move alternate level of care patients into the community?

The latest conflict is in Windsor, where the LHIN has refused to give the Community Care Access Centre a waiver to run a $5.2 million deficit.

The CCAC is arguing demand is on the rise and patients will be stranded in hospital if they are unable to provide home care services. Just yesterday Windsor Regional Hospital CEO David Musyj was urging patients to go elsewhere in the anticipated post-Christmas rise in demand for ER services.

No home care. No hospital care. People in the Windsor area must be truly wondering about the direction of their health care.

The CCAC says the overall increase in home care patients is rising by 1,000 to 1,500 per year in Erie St. Clair, and coming out of hospital sooner, these patients are more costly to serve. The cost of the CCACs end-of-life program is rising by 11 per cent per year.

The CCAC is also facing more demand because of delay in the building of a planned 256 bed long-term care home at St. Clair College. They say that delay is costing them $3 million annually.

The LHIN is willing to help out with a one-time grant of $1.5 million while they “study” the needs of the CCAC. In an unusually frank retort, CCAC Executive Director Betty Kutcha told the Windsor Star that “in my view, they’ve got a $1.5 million solution, so they’re trying to fit our problem into that.”

We are hearing that the Home First program – an initiative where hospitals are supposed to discharge patients home to wait for long-term care placement – is increasing overall community referrals to the CCACs by 10 per cent or more. This is a significant strain on their budgets.

Even the Auditor General of Ontario was skeptical in his summer report of the government’s plans to reduce the rate of growth in hospital spending based on service from home care and long-term care where the level of restraint is expected to be even more severe.

When the Health Restructuring Commission of the late 1990s made its recommendations around the transfer of mental health services to community-based agencies, they were adamant that no beds should close until community-based resources were established. The government cut the beds, didn’t provide anywhere near adequate service in the community, and left us with a system that has been the subject of one report after another calling for better.

Are we to repeat the experience as the government pushes hospitals to discharge patients before adequate community resources are put in place?

Seems we never learn.

Walker misses point on why for-profit nursing homes cherry-pick residents

Dr. David Walker is accusing long-term care homes of cherry-picking patients who are easy to care for, leaving more complex ones to hospitals.

As the province’s point person on the alternate level of care issue, did he just discover this?

When Ontario decided to put the more than half of its nursing home beds in the hands of profit-seeking companies, what did they expect?

Continue reading