-
Join 546 other subscribers


-
Recent Posts
- Another attack at Waypoint: Action needed NOW
- Grassroots activism is the key to worker health and safety
- The TPP will hurt health care
- Confronting the problem of violence against health workers
- All health care workers matter
- CBS CEO backpedals on paying Canadians for their plasma
- An ounce of prevention: Fighting poverty improves health
- Bloodwatch.org calls out minister over for-profit paid-donor plasma clinics
- Our hospitals are bleeding
- The real trouble with home care
- Why are we risking Canada’s blood supply – again?
- “Care as a relationship” is key to good long-term care: research
- OPSEU fights back against Wynne’s hospital cuts
- Home care: the debate the government wants to avoid
- Where’s Linda Knight now?
Archives

Blogroll
- A Different Point of View BLOG
- Advocacy Centre for the Elderly
- All Together Now Campaign (NUPGE)
- Behind The Numbers
- Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives — Ontario Office
- Canadian Doctors for Medicare
- Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care
- Canadian Health Professional Secretariat (CHPS)
- Canadian Obesity Network
- CLC Fairness Works Campaign Site
- Diablogue-Fr
- Dialogue Back Issues
- Doctors For Fair Taxation
- Dr. Michael Rachlis web site
- Facts & Myths about Medicare Sustainability – CCPA
- False Positive
- Friends of the Ajax-Pickering Hospital
- George Monbiot BLOG
- Health Providers Against Poverty
- Healthy Debate
- Horizons of Friendship
- Leftwords: Defending Public Health Care
- Making Medicare
- Ontario Government Sunshine List
- Ontario Health Coalition
- Ontario Public Service Employees Union
- Operation Maple
- Ottawa May Day Event
- People for Corporate Tax Cuts
- Picking Up The Pieces
- Progressive Bloggers
- Road Trip — Investigating Tim Hudak's plan to cut your wages
- Straight Goods
- Students for Medicare
- The Big Push Campaign
- The Unsocial Media BLOG
- Upstream: Institute for a Healthy Society
- Weighty Matters (Dr. Yoni Freedhoff)
- What Will You Do When I'm Gone?
Submit your questions for televised election debate
The three major provincial party leaders will engage in a televised debate Tuesday September 27 from 6:30 pm to 8 pm.
Dalton McGuinty of the Liberal Party of Ontario, Andrea Horwath of the Ontario New Democrats and Tim Hudak of the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario will participate in the debate which will be moderated by TVO’s Steve Paikin.
Please submit your questions for the leaders to: question@electiondebate2011.ca
Viewer questions will begin each of six rounds of debate. In each round, two of the leaders will debate for six minutes; the third leader will join the other two for a three-person debate for the subsequent eight minutes.
The Consortium that is putting on the debate is comprised of Ontario’s major television networks (CBC, CTV, Global TV, Sun TV News, TVO).
Looking for an all-candidate meeting?
The Ontario Health Coalition has organized a series of all-candidate forums across the province. Find one near you!
TODAY: St Catharines
Tuesday, September 20th at 7pm
Port Dalhousie Legion, 600 Ontario St
TODAY: Guelph
In association with the Guelph Wellington Coalition for Social Justice
Tuesday, September 20th at 7:30pm
Italian Canadian Club, 135 Ferguson St
Peterborough
Friday, September 23rd at 7pm
Market Hall, 140 Charlotte St
Note: The date of this meeting has recently changed from Wednesday September 21st to Friday September 23rd. Please make note of this as the previous date was already published.
Welland
Tuesday, September 27th at 7pm
Welland Lion’s Hall, 414 River Road
Niagara Falls
Thursday, September 22nd at 7pm
Gale Centre, 4171 Fourth Ave
London North
Tuesday, September 27th at 7pm to 10 pm,
A.B. Lucas Secondary School, 656 Tennent Avenue
Parking on Street
Chatham-Kent
Tuesday, September 27th at 7pm
Oak’s Inn, 80 McNaughton Ave, Wallaceburg
Peterborough
In association with the RNAO
Tuesday, October 4th at 7pm
Grace United Church, 581 Howden St
Ottawa
Thursday, Sept. 22nd at 7 pm
D. Roy Kennedy Public School, 919 Woodroffe Avenue
Belleville
In partnership with Canadian Association of Retired People
Thursday September 27th at 6:30 pm
Belleville Fish and Game Club, 170 Elmwood Drive, Belleville.
Focus to be on seniors’ health issues.
Picton
Thursday September 29th at 7:00 pm
Regent Theatre, 224 Picton Main Street
Kingston
Wednesday September 21st at 7:00 pm
North Kingston Community Health Center, 400 Elliot Avenue
Focusing on women’s health issues.
Brockville
In Association with the Health Care Providers of Leeds and Grenville
Tuesday September 27 at 4:30pm,
Brockville Arts Centre
Health care has finally made it to the Ontario election
After talking about everything but health care, the major parties are turning their attention to the issue Ontarians say they most care about.
Premier Dalton McGuinty raised the Harris/Eves record while in Ottawa this week, noting the PCs closed 28 hospitals while the Liberals opened 18 news ones.
This is technically true, but not entirely correct. When hospitals merged, it allowed for satellite locations to remain a part of the hospital even if it no longer offered full hospital services. In some cases, it did involve actually taking the white and blue “H” sign off the side of the building.
Fort Erie and Port Colborne both technically lost their hospitals once the Emergency Rooms were closed by the McGuinty government, but both facilities remain part of the Niagara Health System.
In Shelburne the situation couldn’t be clearer – the last services offered at the local hospital were removed a few years ago and now residents are told to go to Orangeville for service. Shelburne’s local hospital was once part of the Headwaters Health System, which continues to exist. Technically Headwaters is still with us, but not the Shelburne Hospital. You can’t get much more closed than that.
The Ontario Health Coalition has been campaigning to keep small and rural hospitals open amid plans to further rationalize local health services.
More interesting is McGuinty’s reminder that the Mike Harris government attempted to close the cardiac unit at the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO). At the time the Tories argued that there were too few procedures performed to maintain clinical proficiency and competency for this kind of specialized care. This is an argument that the McGuinty government have themselves used repeatedly to justify the concentration of services in the so-called “centres of excellence.”
The Liberals allege that the current Tory platform has a $14 billion hole in it, implying the $6.1 billion four-year commitment to health care funding increases may be just an illusion.
It is no surprise that the Liberals have decided to attack on health care – an August Nanos poll indicated voters trust McGuinty much more on the health file, whereas Hudak and McGuinty post similar numbers when it comes to taxes and the economy.
The Liberals have also been under attack for recent changes to what has been a motherhood issue – literally. The McGuinty government is cutting the “Healthy Babies Health Children” program operated by public health. Within 48 hours of discharge a new mother is offered a phone call and subsequent visit from a public health nurse. Instead the government is planning on making this program available for high-risk families only.
The NDP campaign so far has focused on jobs, transit, tourism, education, corporate taxes, municipalities, agriculture and green initiatives – but little about health care despite significant commitments in their “Change That Puts People First” platform.
NDP health critic France Gelinas recently told the Globe and Mail that Tim Hudak’s plan to create thousands of long-term care beds does little good if the people occupying them would be better served through home care. The NDP plans to increase the supply of home care by a million hours over four years and to conduct a comprehensive review with the goal of creating a new publicly-owned and accountable home care system.
Thousands march on Queen’s Park to protect health care
TORONTO – September 13 labour and community groups stood up for health care, marching past Toronto’s “hospital row” and rallying on the lawn of the Ontario legislature.
Singing, dancing and remembering those who died unnecessarily — speakers vowed to make politicians accountable during this election.
Sponsored by the Ontario Health Coalition, buses brought activists from across the province to the rally. A moment of silence was observed for those who had recently died during Ontario’s C Difficle outbreak.
OPSEU 2nd Vice-President Nancy Pridham was among labour leaders who joined community activists on the speaker’s podium.
To watch a five minute video of the two-hour event, click on the box below. And please share!
Fun video highlights upcoming demo Sept 26
While health care tops the polls in this fall’s provincial election, the City of Toronto is also staring down major cuts to service, including health care. What’s being billed as a demonstration/flash mob is being organized September 26 at 5:30 pm in front of City Hall.
Watch this fun music video made for the event:
Posted in Health System
Tagged City of Toronto, cuts to service, Rob Ford, September 26 rally
Making alcohol more widely available has health cost implications
Ontario’s corner store owners are trying to stir up liquor privatization in the midst of the provincial election. They want thousands of convenience stores to be able to sell beer and wine in the province. The fringe Libertarian Party is going further by demanding the “repeal” of the LCBO and to allow anyone to sell alcohol.
Apparently what we need in the province is more access to alcohol, or so the corner stores say. For most of us, this is definitely a head scratcher.
When a final decision is made, Ontario needs to look very closely at the real costs of doing so, including the health costs.
The Local Health Integration Networks finally seem to be coming around to the idea of dealing with upstream costs, realizing there are huge savings to be had by preventing illness.
Allowing thousands of corners stores to sell booze would make such efforts into farce.
With the exception of the right-wing Fraser Institute, most studies have directly linked availability of liquor to consumption levels. Of course there are other factors, including price, but availability appears to be a key indicator.
As liquor sales go up, so do other health problems, ranging from liver cirrhosis to depression to addiction – all representing significant cost to our health system.
Provinces set up Liquor Control Boards precisely to limit the sale of liquor based on rational social needs.
The Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse found in a 2004 survey that 32 per cent of respondents reported that in the past year they had experienced some harm due to drinking by others.
Walking into a convenience store you may be tempted to sign their petition. Before doing so, think about how much you will really have to pay to get your beer and wine at the corner store. You may not like the answer.
Video: Peterborough’s “improvement plan” not working — staff
Only in Ontario can you eliminate between 250-300 positions caring for people and call it a “hospital improvement plan.”
Professional and support staff at Peterborough Regional Health Centre were joined by members of the local health coalition to speak out September 6 about the state of their hospital after implementation of the plan.
The workers — represented by OPSEU, ONA and CUPE — held a short rally outside of MPP Jeff Leal’s constituency office on the day before the Ontario election. Despite advance warning, Leal was not present.
To watch a short video of the event, click on the box below:
Election 2011: Liberal health platform focuses on home supports
The McGuinty Liberals released their long-awaited campaign platform on Labour Day, focussing on education promises while mostly extolling the virtues of their health care record.
However, when it comes to health care, the Liberals are not shy about reminding voters of what happened under the last PC government: “Ontario surgical wait-times used to be the longest in Canada,” the platform states. “The last PC government closed 28 hospitals and fired 6,200 nurses. Many Ontarians didn’t have a family doctor.”
The Liberals are promising to “keep seniors out of emergency rooms and hospital beds by keeping them healthy, in their homes and with loved ones.” The platform includes three million new hours of home care and $60 million to increase house calls by doctors and other health professionals. They also plan to provide “Health Care Coordinators” who will “facilitate care between specialists and family doctors, hospitals and the community to help seniors who’ve been hospitalized within the previous 12 months.” The platform also includes tax credits up to $1,500 to renovate homes to make them more accessible for the frail and elderly, protect jobs for up to eight weeks if an individual should need to provide family caregiver leave, and provide money for research into Alzheimers and dementia.
They say they are “redesigning Ontario’s primary care and homecare system,” although it is not clear what that means.
The Liberals may have noticed our summer television campaign as they remembered to add to their promises the need to train more doctors, nurses, and health professionals.
No specific targets are mentioned.
Every person in the province will have access to a personalized on-line Cancer Risk Profile which uses your medical and family history to measure the risk of cancer. The system promises to match people to screening programs and prevention supports, such as genetic testing for high-risk people.
The Liberals will also create a Council on Childhood Obesity whose goal will be a 20 per cent reduction of the childhood obesity rate within five years. Part of the plan will be a health snack program in schools. They also plan to use tax credits towards children’s activities.
Given the attention to mental health in recent years, it is disappointing to see no more than the existing status quo which will focus only on children’s mental health over the next three years. The present mental health strategy lacks any longer term goals despite earlier promises of a 10-year strategy. Ontario remains an embarrassment on mental health. Mental Health makes up 5.4 cents of the health care dollar, well below the 8 cents recommended by the World Health Organization.
The Liberal platform doesn’t make any funding projections for health care, although the auditor’s pre-election report confirmed their target of 3.6 per cent per year over the next three years, more than the Tories promise of 3 per cent annually, but considerably less than the pattern set over the last eight years.
The platform is also silent on the future of the Local Health Integration Networks, which the NDP plan to replace and the PCs plan to cut.
Other articles about party platforms:
PCs – Tim Hudak wants you to compete for the job you already have
Posted in Health System
Tagged Dalton McGuinty, Ontario Election, Ontario Liberals, Party Election Platforms
Tories set the stage for problems at eHealth
According to Toronto Star columnist Martin Regg Cohn, Tory leader Tim Hudak intends to use the e-Health scandal in the provincial election much like Toronto Mayor Rob Ford used gravy at the municipal level.
What Hudak might be a little more worried about is the media taking a serious look at what the Auditor-General of Ontario actually had to say in his report on eHealth.
While it is true there were many sole-source contracts, the reality is the problems at eHealth can be directly linked back to the Smarts System for Health Agency (SSHA) started by the Tories.
In fact, of the $1 billion spent as of 2009, the year the auditor filed his report, $800 million of it was spent in the six years leading up to the scandal – including the Harris/Eves years.
Much of the Ontario General’s report focuses on the fact that the SSHA was set up without a strategic plan, leading to incredible waste. Looking at the slow progress of the SSHA in 2006, McGuinty hired Deloitte Consulting to do a comprehensive review.
“Among the problems Deloitte identified was the absence of a comprehensive government eHealth strategy, which resulted in the SSHA not being clear on its role and not being able to complete its own strategy,” writes the auditor.
The problem with consultants was one that escalated over time. Some of the consultants, the auditor reported, had been under contract for seven years –that would be prior to the arrival of the McGuinty government.
In his report, the auditor questions the reliance on consultants: “The fact that the development of an EHR (Electronic Health Record) had been on the government’s agencda as far back as the early 2000s caused us to question the heavy, and in some cases almost total, reliance on consultants.”
While the auditor had found improper sole-source contracting, and contract awards to companies that had much higher bids, the auditor made it clear there was no evidence of political influence or fraud despite Hudak’s accusations of “deliberate price-fixing and bid-rigging.”
Clearly eHealth was a mess. It started with poor foundations set by the Tories, and it took the Liberals well into their second term before the mess could be addressed.
Hudak is promising an inquiry. He may think otherwise, especially if he bothered to actually read the auditor’s report.
Most Ontarians do not use on-line hospital resources
Hospitals are required to post quality information on-line, but most Ontarians are not looking.
In a July Vector Poll, only 25 per cent of respondents said they were aware of quality information posted on-line. Slightly fewer, 24 per cent, said they looked for hospital information on-line.
Among older users, those more inclined to be using the system, fewer are using these resources. Only 16 per cent of respondents over the age of 55 said they ever looked for information on the website of a hospital in the province.
Among those who have gone on-line, 25 per cent said they found the information hard to understand.
Only 27 per cent of Ontarians said they were aware of Ontario’s wait times website and only 16 per cent said they have visited it to take a look.
While there is support for making information public, more than two of three (68 per cent) Ontarians said it was more important for government to monitor hospitals to make sure they met minimum standards for quality care.
British epidemiologist Richard Lilford warns that on-line comparisons can be dangerous: Lilford says if the public uses online comparisons as report cards on good and bad hospitals it could encourage hospital administrators to turn away patients with the poorest health or the worst chance of recovering. This “may lead to overly aggressive care, which is inhumane and drives up costs.”
The findings are based on interviews conducted July 12-21, 2011 of 1,106 adults across Canada, 502 in Ontario. The Ontario sample error is plus or minus 4.4 percentage points.
Posted in Uncategorized