Windsor: Cancer Care Ontario finds out the hard way about community engagement

Score one for the Windsor community.

After Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) told the Windsor Regional Hospital that it had to transfer thoracic cancer surgeries to London or else, CCO found out the hard way that engaging the community is really important.

CCO backed down this week – the Windsor Regional Hospital being designated a Level 2 thoracic cancer surgery centre, the threatened withdrawal of $800,000 in cancer funding no longer on the table. “Thoracic,” incidentally, refers to the chest area.

Unclear at this point is whether an additional $633,000 that was clawed back from the Windsor Hotel Dieu Grace Hospital will also be restored. In the great Windsor hospital campus swap, those services have since been inherited by WRH.

Everybody played a role in fighting back – a lesson for hospital CEOs across Ontario who feel they have no alternative but to play along with the Ministry’s “transformation agenda.”

Windsor CEO David Musyj went public in his efforts to save the service. NDP MPP Taras Natyshak put up an on-line petition that thousands had signed on to. Even Liberal Cabinet Minister Teresa Piruzza played her role in presenting the community’s case to Health Minister Deb Matthews. Most of all the media are crediting the community for mobilizing so quickly around this issue. That includes a campaign by the Windsor Health Coalition to distribute 40,000 leaflets door-to-door.

The case made by CCO to move the service to London was always a weak one.  They claimed Windsor just did not have the volumes to do this work safely. They were wrong. WRH by volume does qualify by CCO’s own definition as a level 2 facility, a point Musyj made in his letter to Dr. Michael Sherar, CEO and President of CCO.

Arbitrarily, after having designated hospitals in Thunder Bay and Kingston as level 2 facilities, CCO decided to call it a day, leaving the entire Erie St. Clair LHIN without such a centre.

It rather makes you wonder how many of the other so-called “evidence-based” decisions communities have been forced to endure are as equally weak?

Former Health Minister George Smitherman liked the idea of communities being involved with local health planning. While the Local Health Integration Networks leave a lot to be desired in how they operate, Ontarians appear to have bought into the idea that yes, we really should have a say.

Now that the thoracic cancer surgeries have been saved, the Windsor community may want to give thought to the upcoming review of the legislation that governs the Local Health Integration Networks. Whereas the LHIN has the responsibility for local planning, including access to cancer services, it’s not clear what role they played — if any — in this unfolding drama. If they expect the LHINs to work on their behalf, the freshly mobilized Windsor community should be prepared to stick an oar in.

Royal Ottawa — prosecutions fly below the radar

The Ministry of Labour inspectors have significant powers when it comes to enforcing the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

What’s difficult to discern is where the dividing line is between issuing orders and prosecuting an employer for violations of the Act.

After months of investigation into seven complaints and 77 incidents at Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, in May the Ministry issued 15 orders to address issue around workplace violence.

Given how big the investigation was, how many incidents had taken place, and how many workers were interviewed, we were stunned that no charges were laid. By contrast, Ontario Shores was separately prosecuted and fined $37,500 for an incident around a worker injured cleaning and replacing a ventilation hood.

Last week we got word by a very convoluted route that the Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre was facing prosecution on three counts stemming from a single incident of workplace violence in June 2012.

Continue reading

A single question that could change how we approach population health

In all the talk about health care sustainability we lose sight of the fact that the interventions that cost the least and are likely to have the biggest impact on population health take place outside the confines of the Ministry of Health.

Regulation has become a dirty word, made so by those who have a vested interest in making profits from activities that may not necessarily be in our best interests.

As a public we all subsidize this bad behavior in part through higher health care costs. Ottawa’s Dr. Yoni Freedhoff, for example, points out that a single serving Coca Cola bottle of our grandparents’ generation was less than a third of the size of what kids buy today at a typical vending machine or corner store. Three times the sugar, three times the calories. While I can hear the howls of freedom of choice from here, we have less freedom of choice when it comes to all of us paying the health costs related to rising rates of diabetes.

What if we were to regulate the soft drink industry to establish a standard size for a single-serving beverage? Would the wheels of industry come to a halt? Would thousands be thrown out of work? Of course not.

We don’t regulate for several reasons. For starters we keep on electing people to office who oppose the idea of government. Secondly, these same people have persuaded us that we can’t trust government. Third we have replaced our faith in government with a blind faith in business even though the root of many of our modern-day scandals is in the relationship between the two.

Continue reading

We don’t want to know the cancer risk of our drug of choice

We love our booze. It’s our drug of choice.

Given 83 per cent of men and 74 per cent of women are drinkers; we don’t want to hear about the negative health effects. Most of us know about the repercussions of binge drinking, such as those who choose to drive while under the influence, but only one in three Canadians know that alcohol places you at an elevated risk for at least six cancers, including colorectal and breast cancer. That’s a national embarrassment. Alcohol-related cancers affect between 6200-9900 Canadians each year.

“People are very uncomfortable with this in our society,” veteran journalist Ann Dowsett Johnston said on Friday during a Toronto forum on cancer and alcohol. Public health advocacy groups have set low risk guidelines – two drinks per day for men, one for women, none for pregnant women – but Johnston says there has been very little traction on these guidelines.

The LCBO has distributed more than a million such leaflets on the guidelines. Did anyone actually read them?

Dowsett Johnston says we have become an alcogenic society. The promotion of alcohol is everywhere, from the glossy newspaper inserts to the media content itself. She calls the Saturday style section of the Globe and Mail the “cocktail section.”

Part of the problem is there is no consistent communication around how big the problem is. The reality is there is no safe level of alcohol consumption. When more than three quarters of Canadians are consumers, you try to mitigate risk, you don’t eliminate it. Evidence would suggest the more you drink, the higher the risk.

Continue reading

Underpaid PSWs locked out after refusing wage concessions

The March of Dimes is a registered charity that helps Ontarians with disabilities live independently. Recently the charity locked out about 30 Oakville Personal Support Workers (PSWs) after they refused to give in to wage concessions. These  OPSEU-represented PSWs are currently paid as little as $14 an hour — or what some advocates are saying should be the minimum wage. This is for work that is both skilled and challenging. Meanwhile, the CEO of the March of Dimes rewards herself with compensation that is about $270,000 annually.  The majority of the March of Dimes funding for disability support comes from the Province of Ontario. Our colleagues at Operation Maple recently made this video to tell their story and suggest that perhaps any further charitable donations should come with a condition.

Jim – it’s you who loves P3s, not us

The Honourable Jim Flaherty
Minister of Finance
House of Commons Centre Block Building – Room 435-S
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6

Dear Jim  –

We get it. You love public-private partnerships, or as most like to call ‘em, P3s. The sound of big business rushing in and signing great big multi-million and multi-billion dollar contracts with governments to privately finance, build, maintain and sometimes operate hospitals, court houses, schools, bridges, transit systems – why it just makes your ol’ leprechaun heart sing.

Y’er getting all that “dead” corporate money moving, right?

We know these days that investors are nervous of even their own shadow, so governments need to give them sure-fire money makers at the public’s expense. It’ll buck ‘em up.

Paying it all back, well yeah, those are details best left for another day. What the heck – our children use this infrastructure too, so why shouldn’t they be prepared to pay for it over a generation or two? And if they can’t, there are always their children to pay after them. And their children’s children. Hold on, we’re getting a bit dizzy here.

With the over-inflated costs of these projects, we can hear the big profits clinking from here, even with our windows closed. And at the union we have good windows.

Here comes our beef:

On Tuesday you told a panel that the Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre P3 was “incredibly successful” and that the “unions love it, the nurses love it, the physicians love it, the patients love it.”

Continue reading

Scarborough-Rouge merger comes with costly conditions

The merger of The Scarborough Hospital (TSH) with the Rouge Valley Health System (RVHS) will not come cheap. Last night the hospital boards approved the idea of merger but only under very specific and costly conditions.

Nor will the merger necessarily stem the tide of cuts The Scarborough Hospital has been experiencing. At last night’s special meeting of the TSH board, CEO Robert Biron was asked whether continuing cuts would be seen as a failure of the merger?

Biron said funding constraint is part of the government’s transformation agenda and that merged or not, the hospitals would have to navigate it anyway. He told the board that together they were more likely to minimize the impact of such restraint.

Given an estimated $29.5 million in one-time fixed costs around the merger plus a wage harmonization bill of $5.4 million, these costs are likely to be held up against the loss of any services the merged hospital decides to shed in the future. There is still resentment over the loss of $17 million worth of services earlier this year to balance TSH’s budget.

Continue reading

Jumping into the fire

The last few days appear to suggest the brave new world of health reform is not unfolding as it theoretically should.

The news is all around us: another violent death in a nursing home; another frail senior discharged early from hospital without support; another community upset about losing a key hospital service; and a fresh report to suggest we are losing the battle to tackle the social determinants of health.

To make matters worse, a leaked report over the weekend from the Tories suggests that the next election may revolve around further assaulting the standard of living for working people by significantly undermining their unions. Does anybody believe a declining standard of living is going to improve anything, let alone population health in Ontario?

If you were Sandy Bullock lost in space, would you really want to struggle that hard to come back to earth?

Given how much stock the government has placed on moving patients out of hospital and into community, the entire agenda may implode once Ontarians discover for themselves how threadbare is the alternative.

Continue reading

Scarborough-Durham: A journey to protect health care

Tomorrow the Ontario Health Coalition is inviting Scarborough and Ajax residents to go on a journey to protect their health care.

Much attention has been paid to the proposed merger between the Scarborough and Rouge Valley hospitals. Less attention has been paid to the fact that even with a merger, the combined mega-hospital will still be looking for $28 million in savings next year and more in subsequent years due an unprecedented base funding freeze on Ontario hospitals. This is on top of $17 million in budget cuts that have already taken place this year at The Scarborough Hospital.

To complicate matters further, the two CEOs describe the impact of a new phased in funding formula as being from negative to neutral.

That’s surprising given Scarborough-Rouge should stand to benefit from such a formula given the significant number of surgeries that take place, the population demographics and the high population growth in the eastern part of their combined catchment area.

It does add to the questions that are being raised about the algorithm of such a formula and whether it adequately takes into consideration the social determinants of health.

The OHC is organizing a rolling day of action that is aimed at the province, not the boards of the hospitals. You can choose to participate in all of it or just the part that’s closer to you.

The group will be visiting MPP offices throughout the day calling upon the Wynne government to properly fund these hospitals.

If you don’t have a vehicle, there will be carpooling between the destinations.

Here’s the schedule:

Continue reading

Afraid of losing control — a found message from HealthAchieve

DSC_0038

At this year’s Ontario Hospital Association HealthAchieve the organizers hired a graphic artist to illustrate many of the sessions. After each session, participants were invited to look at the graphic and leave their own comments behind using Post-it notes.

Amid all the talk of living in times of revolution and the need to recognize creativity throughout our organizations, one person put up a note that said: “we are afraid of loosing control.” We can only assume the individual was a bit spelling-challenged and meant “losing control.”

That was probably the most frank statement we saw over the three days.

Despite being challenged by some great international thinkers – including Sir Ken Robinson and Ray Kurzweil – this year’s conference seemed to be missing some of its usual mojo.

Continue reading